In practice, freethinking is most closely linked with secularism, atheism, agnosticism, anti-clericalism, and religious critique.
Freethought (or free thought) is an epistemological viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed only on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a freethinker is "a person who forms their own ideas and opinions rather than accepting those of other people, especially in religious teaching." In some contemporary thought in particular, freethought is strongly tied with rejection of traditional social or religious belief systems. The cognitive application of freethought is known as "freethinking", and practitioners of freethought are known as "freethinkers". Modern freethinkers consider freethought as a natural freedom from all negative and illusive thoughts acquired from the society.
The term first came into use in the 17th century in order to indicate people who inquired into the basis of traditional religious beliefs. In practice, freethinking is most closely linked with secularism, atheism, agnosticism, anti-clericalism, and religious critique. The Oxford English Dictionary defines freethinking as, "The free exercise of reason in matters of religious belief, unrestrained by deference to authority; the adoption of the principles of a free-thinker." Freethinkers hold that knowledge should be grounded in facts, scientific inquiry, and logic. The skeptical application of science implies freedom from the intellectually limiting effects of confirmation bias, cognitive bias, conventional wisdom, popular culture, prejudice, or sectarianism.
Free Thought: The term first came into use in the 17th century in order to indicate people who inquired into the basis of traditional religious beliefs. In practice, freethinking is most closely linked with secularism, atheism, agnosticism, anti-clericalism, and religious critique.
Post.... 3905 Listen I have followed Q and President Trump since the beginning. I'm not for or against. I still haven't found out "the End Goal" of Q or President Trump. Every time I have seen this Post 3905 I have the same Question and no one has the answer. So, Please help me out. How can a Christian be a part of the "free Thought movement" and how can the The Founding Fathers who wrote the Constitution and were devout Christians living in obedience the Jesus Christ the Very Word of God. Be a part of a completely different religion. Would that not cause Cognitive dissidence? :To hold two separate World views views, 2 separate value systems, 2 Separate "End Goals" in one's mind at the same time? They would be what the Bible calls double minded. 3905 Christianity is a "Revelation" of God, Jesus Death on the Cross, a believe that people MUST be saved and repent. Revelation by the very Holy power Spirit of Almighty God.
Free Thought in itself is an ideology, A Political Movement, a "Religion", A belief system. there is No God, Man is god, Man can achieve anything he can dream of, a "world view", Values come from one's education, discovery, experience not from Almighty God's Holy Spirit or his written inspired word, the Bible.
The Constitution is based on the Religious Revelation of the good news of Jesus Christ. All men are equal before God. Jesus Blood paid the price for all mankind's sin. We get that from the Bible which is an inspired written. People must come to God by Faith. The Whole United States of America The Republic, Constitution is Based on the BIBLE> As inspired by the Holy Spirit. . Not a Mormon revelation From one man. But a Revelation "of One Man". So the Constitution is a Threat to "Free thought" which does not allow for Revelation of The Gospel of Jesus Christ.
So "Free Thought" is a Clear and present Danger to the original Constitution based on the Revelation of Gospel of Jesus Christ. "Free thought" is a ! Post 3905: philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Free Thought in itself is an ideology, A Political Movement, a "Religion", A belief system. No God, Man is god.
Google search Free Thought: The Golden Age of Freethought is the mid 19th-century period in United States history which saw the development of the socio-political movement promoting freethought. The period roughly from 1875 to 1914 is referred to as "the high-water mark of freethought as an influential movement in American society". It began around 1856 and lasted at least through the end of the century; author Susan Jacoby places the end of the Golden Age at the start of World War I.
Freethought is a philosophical position that holds that ideas and opinions should be based on science and reason, and not restricted by authority, tradition, or religion. The Golden Age was encouraged by the lectures of the extremely popular agnostic orator Robert G. Ingersoll, the popularization of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species, the push for women’s suffrage, and other political, scientific, and social trends that clashed with religious orthodoxy and caused people to question their traditional ideas about the world.
A freethinker of the late 19th century could have been someone from any of the varied religious and political backgrounds. Charles Knowlton, D. M. Bennett, and Robert G. Ingersoll were influential freethinkers of the period.
Robert Green Ingersoll (1833–1899) was one of the more prominent freethinkers of his time. He was known as the “Great Agnostic”. Ingersoll, a lawyer, an orator and a Civil War veteran, is famous for his skeptical approaches to popular religious beliefs. He would speak in public about orthodox views and would often poke fun. Guests would pay $1 to hear him speak. A dollar in his day was a hefty sum. Ingersoll was the leader of the American Secular Union, successor organization to the National Liberal League.
the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change.